Wednesday, July 31, 2024

Quick Links to Criminal Evidence Postings on Michelle Dickerman (Manweiler) and the Charlottesville Law Enforcement

     Michelle Dickerman Department of Treasury Joseph Platania Warner Chapman Charlottesville Nicholas Rudman John Dickerman CBI Confederation of British Industry British-American Business Association BABA

Pictured from left to right: Michelle Annette Dickerman (Manweiler) of Falls Church VA and a Deputy Assistant General Counsel for the US Department of Treasury; Joseph Platania the current head prosecutor for Charlottesville VA; Warner Chapman the former head prosecutor for Charlottesville VA

Listing updated with additional info on 01/25/2024, link for a post discussing the favoritism and special treatment towards law enforcement, as well as that received by Michelle Dickerman and her family over the years.


I will be periodically re-posting this listing to refresh the blog in Google search results, especially to combat any attempts to cause issues with its placement in the search results.

***New website under construction***
 
www.michellemanweiler.com 

***Notice To Future Viewers of This Blog via Media Coverage***
Please read the following post before viewing the other information linked further down: To Future Viewers
This post gives a summary of the dispute and the reasons behind my decisions and actions - both those of the past and those coming in the future. It will give you far more information on the truth of the situation than the coverage you'll likely see displayed on the news initially. Once the story of what prompted all this comes to the forefront, hopefully the coverage will begin to shed light on the corrupt individuals behind the injustice that led to this point.

Recent Impact and Further Explanations on Evidence Against Michelle Dickerman (Manweiler)
One of the most important pieces of evidence proving Michelle Annette Dickerman (formerly Michelle Annette Manweiler) tampered with the evidence she provided to law enforcement is presented here in a more detailed explanation. This evidence not only shows that Michelle Dickerman committed criminal acts by using her law school training to tamper with evidence, but it shows Charlottesville prosecutors Warner Chapman and Joseph Platania were negligent/incompetent in their handling of this case. I further charge that both these prosecutors actually became aware Michelle Dickerman tampered with the evidence after they had already jailed me, and they then swept it under the rug to prevent any repercussions to their careers. They in turn committed violations of civil rights for the purpose of hiding the evidence I present here. This evidence would have not only resulted in criminal charges against Mrs. Dickerman in 2006, but if this information becomes public it would result in severe legal consequences for the Charlottesville police and district attorney's office.

A Catalog of Lies - Michelle Dickerman (Manweiler)
This post goes over the evidence proving Michelle Dickerman lied to law enforcement and the courts, using her own words and statements against her. This post, in addition to the above evidence post, displays how Michelle Dickerman committed serious criminal actions in 2006 to mislead law enforcement and the court. If my evidence were to be presented in court Michelle Dickerman would receive serious criminal charges. She potentially may have been considered under oath as well, leading to the addition of a Class 5 Felony for Perjury.

The Case for Malicious Prosecution
Addendum to 'The Case for Malicious Prosecution'
The two posts above go over the evidence proving that the case conducted against me in 2006 was criminally malicious in nature on the part of the prosecution as well as on the part of Michelle Dickerman and her family. It also goes into some of the bad behavior of the prosecution and my former attorney. Additionally they discuss the excessive nature of the penalties I was hammered with and the clearly malicious reasoning behind the penalties. The evidence presented here, compiled with the additional criminal evidence I've posted before, makes a case for both criminal and civil penalties to be faced by the guilty parties for Malicious Prosecution.

Law Enforcement Corruption and Cover-ups
This post goes over current examples of law enforcement corruption and coverups, specifically involving major scandals with the West Virginia State Police. This is to help demonstrate that yes, law enforcement will commit coverups and serious criminal acts just to avoid accountability. I then go over some of the examples of the corrupt and underhanded acts of the Charlottesville law enforcement during my 2006 case. These acts, all of which I have evidence for, show a clear attempt by the Charlottesville police and district attorney's office to coverup for the crimes of Michelle Dickerman. Not necessarily motivated out of any desire to protect Dickerman (though assistant prosecutor Joseph Platania displayed inappropriate affection for Dickerman), but out of a primary motive of avoiding scandals and potential lawsuits.

The Issue of Favoritism: The Special treatment given to Michelle Dickerman and the Manweiler family

"Not to mention the serious problem where a rich white girl cries about getting mean emails, and the system falls all over itself in a race to bludgeon me to death for a crime I didn't actually commit"

This lengthy post goes over cases of corrupt favoritism and special treatment given to law enforcement who commit criminal acts and violations of civil rights. It then goes over the history of Michelle Dickerman and her family garnering special treatment from people in positions of authority - both school administration and law enforcement. The events discussed range from favoritism to gain an academic honor that doesn't appear to have been fairly earned, to receiving protection from law enforcement after committing multiple blatant criminal acts over the years.

Commenting on a Comment
This post relates to a comment made by an individual on a post discussing the case of former UVA student Andrew Alston - who received special treatment and a slap on the wrist for putting 18 to 20 stab wounds in a man (Walter Sisk) and ending his life. Alston was given a light sentence for voluntary manslaughter and is believed to have been sent to a white collar prison by the C'ville court system to serve his sentence. In this post I detail specifics of my case and how it relates to the special treatment received by rich UVA students (a status Michelle Dickerman shares with Alston), and go over the blatant corruption by law enforcement that took place for the benefit of Michelle Dickerman.

Two Felonies for Dickerman
This post goes over two possible felony charges that Michelle Dickerman would face if my evidence was made public. It is my understanding that Virginia does not have a statute of limitations on felony charges, which would mean that Michelle Dickerman could be charged with felonies she committed in 2006 even after nearly 20 years. I also go over a little bit of information on Michelle Dickerman's parents, Gregory and Carole Manweiler, and their liability in civil court for the damages inflicted upon me, as both the prosecution and my former attorney admit her parent's were fully involved in what happened to me. I further put forward that I believe Gregory Manweiler used potential bribery to help press the Charlottesville law enforcement into harming me, and that he needs to be investigated to see if potentially criminal acts were committed on his part. This is a brief description that sets the stage for a currently (as of 03/21/23) in progress post - showing evidence proving not only the civil liability of Dickerman's parents, but also the malicious nature of the actions taken against me by the prosecution, Michelle Dickerman, and Gregory and Carole Manweiler.

Update - Plagscans, Motions, Police Investigations, and Prepping for Things to Come
Among other information, this post shows an informal timeline of the incidents that occurred during the 2006 criminal case. This list helps to demonstrate the shady actions and behavior of the guilty parties, especially Charlottesville Law Enforcement. This entire case reeks of not only special favors and privileges given to Michelle Dickerman (Manweiler) for merely being a UVA student with a rich alumni father, but it also smells of a cover-up for her criminal behavior in tampering with the evidence that the entire case was based upon. The info listed about a potential police investigation is outdated, as it appears Nick Rudman may have already been retired from the department when these odd views occurred. While it is clear that Rudman (or someone connected to him) was involved, I can only speculate on the reasons for the views given that he was no longer a police officer at the time. Perhaps he had a conversation with a family member who later got curious while at work. Or maybe Rudman was applying to the bank for a job and what I experienced was their social media background check. Again, I can provide nothing more than theories with the information currently available.

Michelle Dickerman's Potential for a Serious Personality Disorder
https://therottweilers.blogspot.com/2020/03/update-march-2020.html
https://therottweilers.blogspot.com/2020/04/update-april-2020.html
https://therottweilers.blogspot.com/2020/05/another-puzzle-piece-slides-into-place.html
The links above are a summary of my belief that Michelle Annette Dickerman has a dangerous personality disorder called Vulnerable Narcissistic Personality Disorder. The posts reference videos from various professionals in the field, and behavior they discuss directly links back to behavior witnessed in Michelle Dickerman.

Evidence Against Michelle Dickerman (Manweiler) Part 2
The above link references this much older post on the email evidence. This specific posting was much less detailed. I was prompted to create the new post due to recognizing that I wasn't as clear as I could be with the explanations in this post. I will still keep this post up because it is a popular post on this blog, and because it displays the entire sheet of the emails so you can see the tampering as it originally appears.

Actions of attorney William Johnson, former defense counsel
This posting discusses the actions of my former defense counsel - attorney William Johnson of Matthews County Virginia. This not only details the incompetent and corrupt actions of my former attorney, but it also goes over information showing improper and even criminal behavior on the part of the other parties involved in this case.

2006: My Case and the Andrew Alston Scandal of Charlottesville
This posting discusses how corrupt the Charlottesville court system is and how it works to protect rich University of Virginia students when they commit criminal acts - even if that act results in the death of a non-UVA affiliated citizen. Former UVA student Andrew Alston stabbed a volunteer firefighter to death (18 to 20 stab wounds as reported in the media) in an altercation, yet received a slap on the wrist for voluntary manslaughter when he received less than a third of the maximum sentence in the state of Virginia for this crime. I was actually punished more harshly than a UVA student who killed someone. All for emails sent to a rich UVA law school student - a student who I can prove blatantly tampered with (and even outright fabricated) those emails used as evidence in the case.

Evidence Posting: Part Two
This post shows evidence that Michelle Dickerman (Manweiler) provided false statements in court and to law enforcement, with the intent of causing an excessive response from law enforcement. It also shows that Michelle Dickerman deleted critical evidence in this case, including exculpatory evidence that would have shown my innocence on the felony charge. As a newly graduated law school student, Mrs. Dickerman knew this act was not only wrong, but that such an act could have easily resulted in a charge of obstruction of justice, especially due to the fact that it clearly covers up her tampering of evidence. These pieces of evidence were recorded by my former counsel William Johnson (a lawyer who refused to do his job) in his notes on the case. I have also shown two snips of voice recordings of my former attorney, recorded by my mother during her encounters with my former attorney. In the first recording at William Johnson's office, he fully admits to Manweiler deleting evidence and attempts to make excuses for this act. In the second recording outside the Charlottesville Circuit Court, Johnson freely admits without any prompting that he knew I had no intentions of ever harming anyone - despite having just had me plead guilty to a felony that requires showing of intent at minimum. I have also provided proof that the prosecution threatened me out of my civil right to a fair trial (to cover for Dickerman/Manweiler's blatant tampering) in the form of an email sent by prosecutor Joseph Platania to my former attorney.

Evidence Posting: Part One
This posting proves Michelle Dickerman (Manweiler) lied about events in her victim impact statement, using evidence via letters she wrote to me during the stated time period of the accusation. Her own handwritten letters tell a different story than the one she told to law enforcement. This is not the first time Dickerman was accused of making such false statements as these, as making up such lies has been a repeat accusation from third parties throughout this dispute. By repeating the same lies in 2006 as those she was accused of making in the past, Michelle Dickerman inadvertently confirmed what others had been warning me about for years.

Friday, July 19, 2024

Alright, if we’re going to play that game

Michelle Annette Dickerman US Department of Treasury Falls Church VA
The longer post is still in the works, that’s not what this is about. I’m fine with just having the new update on the main michellemanweiler.com website, and the update post below this one, for now. This is about something a little different.

I had created a LinkedIn profile as a social media advertisement for the website. When I check Google search results to keep an eye on my website's ranking, Michelle Dickerman’s LinkedIn profile shows up at the top of the search results. The website is only a 3 to 4 hits below it but I would like to see it higher.

LinkedIn however is a social media site that gets so much more traffic than any singular non social media website could hope to get, despite LinkedIn's issues and lack of real usefulness in my opinion. This social media site traffic is why LinkedIn ends up at the top of the search rankings for Google. So I figured making a profile on LinkedIn would help balance things out with getting the website showing higher in the search results. This way there would be two profiles shown for Michelle Dickerman at the top of the results and anyone seeing the one I made would immediately become aware of the website. 

The about section made it clear it was a social media outlet for the website, and prominently displayed the website on the profile. I never sent out connection requests to anyone working in government service with Michelle Dickerman, hell I never sent or received connection requests with anyone at all. I didn't even try visiting the profiles of Treasury Department workers, despite the fact this would have helped advertise the website to people Dickerman potentially works with. Granted I've already had results in the past from the Treasury department that were pretty clearly not Michelle Dickerman. There were too many views during work hours, coupled with further outside views after work hours from various homes in the DMV area, and all looking through old posts Dickerman had already seen. It looked like someone saw the blog and started spreading it to others at the Treasury. But spreading the website to her employer wasn't the intention here with the LinkedIn profile.

Unlike Michelle Dickerman I'm not about to go dragging people into this who aren’t party to the dispute. I'd rather those people come to the website of their own volition through other forms of advertising. If they search her name and find my website on their own, that's a better result than me forcing it by showing up in their profile viewers list. They are more likely to give the website a read if they were already looking up information on Dickerman themselves.

Not to mention the entire point of the profile wasn't to create problems for Dickerman at her work. She would absolutely deserve it but that wasn't the goal. I want a much wider audience to what was done to me, because it aids me in repairing some of the damage that was done and lets me hold the guilty parties accountable. Dickerman deserves far worse trouble in her life than just having her fellow employees see the website. Michelle Annette Dickerman deserves to go to jail and get sued into the ground for what she's inflicted. Her parents deserve to lose everything in a civil suit and her father deserves jail time if he interfered in the case at all. Getting the website higher in search results aids in those endeavors in some small way. So the point was simply to get a link to the michellemanweiler.com website at the top of search results.

However, it appears that the profile finally got reported at some point. I can't say I never expected it to happen. It could have been Michelle Dickerman who reported it, or it could have been a third party that knows Dickerman. No way for me to know at this point. LinkedIn never sent me an email about the issue or any reasons behind their actions. But I do have my suspicions on it being Dickerman for a good reason.

Right now LinkedIn is asking me to provide a photo of a government ID to verify the profile every time I try to log in. It will not let me move beyond this verification request. The profile also seems to have been automatically removed from viewing by the public. The fact that I'm asked to provide ID verification is certainly a reasonable indicator that Dickerman reported it as a fake profile. I don't think a 3rd party reporting it as a fake profile would work but I could be mistaken on that point.

It would be pretty easy for me to fake an ID good enough to pass LinkedIn's verification. After all, these social media sites outsource this task overseas to the same companies, with employees who make shit pay doing it. Most of the people doing the reviewing haven't seen American ID's in anything but company instructional videos. They receive a batch of marginal to bad photos taken by a cell phone, and they take all of a minute to look through them before saying yay or nay and moving to the next one. They get a significant amount of pictures of IDs to verify every single day. They simply don't have the time, inclination, or manpower to give all of them close screening. Throw in even the less than stellar AI tools available online now, and I absolutely could pass the ID check if I wanted to do so.

However that would be entering some very shaky ground there. It isn't illegal to submit a fake ID to LinkedIn, they are just a social media company and not a government entity. But I imagine faking the ID itself is probably illegal. Can't imagine that it wouldn't be, but then again I remember fake IDs being somewhat common in my 20s with people trying to buy alcohol. I probably wouldn't even get caught doing it considering what's involved. It isn't like I would be submitting the fake ID to get government employment - it's for social media verification. I certainly wouldn't risk doing a RealID, a regular VA driver's license would have worked. But I haven't bothered to check the laws on fake IDs because I would just rather not enter territory that would even remotely be a grey area legally. I have a chance to fix what this woman did to me in the courts now, and I'd rather not throw that all away trying to fake an ID for a social media website.

So no, getting that specific profile back up isn't something I'm going to bother with, since I'm not going to risk faking an ID. So I'm going to explore other options. I've been using a burner phone and other tools, so creating a brand new profile would be simple. I might try to see if I can make a company page devoted to the website instead of an individual profile, but using Michelle Dickerman's name front and center in some way for the title of the company page. There shouldn't be a problem with that for LinkedIn, and Dickerman won't be able to report it since it's a company page made for the website.

Whether I bother or not I'm not sure. I was content to just sit back and let the profile help with the search results considering the new development. Since I discovered changes to the laws that let me use the Writ of Actual Innocence, I was going to hold off trying anything more significant to advertise the website. But then someone had to go report that profile, and I remember quite clearly in a past post mentioning that this would be considered an escalation. Well someone had to go ahead and escalate now. So I might escalate a step further and do some advertising that has some teeth to it in response. We shall see.

I wanted to add in something additional. Just some thoughts that came to my mind later at night after having posted this earlier in the day.

I genuinely don't want to be doing this shit quite frankly. But someone decided they were going to play games with another person's life in 2006. Completely ripped someone's future apart over bullshit on a social media site nobody even fucking uses anymore. So here we fucking are, going on 20 years when 2026 hits.

Of course this fight goes back further than that. All because a narcissistic and spoiled girl decided she liked fanning the flames of the dispute rather than taking the peaceful alternative that was always presented to her. At least, an alternative presented to her right up until the day she walked into the Charlottesville police department with a lie. Before she made a stupid internet slap fight between two immature people turn into something that I really, really don't think the idiot was ever prepared to actually deal with. She had to have known it was going to get out of hand when she did it. If not she was an absolute dumbass because everyone else saw it. But Dickerman was never one for making good decisions.

Someone decided to lie to the cops, fake evidence, and have me railroaded into a felony she absolutely fucking knew I was innocent of. Someone had to let this shit continue for over a decade because she didn't have the backbone to fess up to her crimes and end this - if for nothing else than for the sake of her family. And as much as I don't want to be doing this shit, I'm only losing steam on the talking about it part. The making people answer for the crimes they committed against me part - that's gone nowhere.

We're going to have our day in court Michelle Annette Dickerman. And if I win that fight in the VA Supreme Court, I'm bringing as much absolute fucking hell down upon her and her parents as I possibly can. I'm going to try to take her parent's home from them in court. Take her inheritance. Ruin reputations so that her father goes to his grave with everyone believing he was a shitbag who manipulated things to get his daughter special treatment - which let's face it, that's almost certainly what the bastard did. The court of public opinion will believe it as well. Everyone who hears how all this went down assumes that Gregory Manweiler had something to do with everything that happened. So Michelle Dickerman has dragged her father down with her because she got butthurt over being called out and insulted.

All of what is coming will cause her family to be shamed and stained, all because of Michelle Dickerman's actions. The longer this goes on the older her kids get and thus the more likely it is that their peers will remember the bad publicity that will come from this case. As the clock keeps ticking longer on a resolution, the more likely it is that her kids will be bullied for their mother's actions for the rest of their grade school careers. Not something I want at all but it isn't up to me. I'm merely the one calling attention to the fact that it won't just be Michelle Dickerman who suffers for what she did in 2006. Everyone around her will be affected in some way when all this moves forward. How long this case goes on for, and how much damage it does, is all dependant upon how long their mother waits before taking responsibility for her crime.

We're going on 20 years of my life these "people" took from me. Time I can never get back. This can never be made right. There is no way of making things whole. So believe me when I say that if the blunt instrument that is the legal system falls into my hands, I'm going to show every bit of the lack of mercy I was shown. And people are going to answer in court (both the legal courts and the public opinion courts) for what they did.

As I mentioned on the website, and will be discussing in the post I'm working, Michelle Dickerman has the option of limiting the damage to herself and her family by "falling on her sword" so to speak - which means her fessing up to the evil she did to another human being. The longer this case continues to go on, the more I have to fight to get my life back, and the more she refuses to take responsibility for the harm she's inflicted, the worse it'll be for Dickerman and her family in the end.

Michelle Dickerman won't fess up of course. She's a narcissist through and through. She doesn't care about her parents, her kids, or her husband. She'll prove me every bit right about her. It won't matter that she could take the hit herself and thus limit the damage to the people around her. The reality is that the only important person in Michelle Dickerman's life is the one she sees in the mirror every day. Fessing up means her reputation and career gets ruined and those are all she values in life. Dickerman would rather drag everyone around her down with her than ever take responsibility for the evils she has committed.

Her refusal to fess up and make things as "right" (as little as that is even possible) will hurt her in both the media and in court. Nobody will find it acceptable that Dickerman let something this evil stand for going on 20 years. People did evil in her name, and then pointed the finger of blame back at her as being the responsible party. Hell she could have done something to fix it over a decade ago when she watched me be unable to gain employment thanks to the felony she had me railroaded into. I can prove that she just sat back and watched me struggle, having never lifted a finger to make any of this right. Nobody is going to find that acceptable at all, and both the public and a jury will rip her a new asshole for it.

Nor will she ever be able to claim she didn't agree with the prosecution's actions. Nobody will believe her if she claims it was all the prosecution's fault. Not when she could have done something about it and yet refused. Nobody will find it acceptable that Michelle Dickerman refused to take responsibility for what she did. But they especially won't find it acceptable if she tries to fight me in court to prevent me from getting my life back. The court of public opinion is going to tear her apart for that especially. Because they will see that it only comes from Dickerman's selfish desire to avoid accountability for her actions.

Michelle Dickerman won't fess up to her actions to limit the damage, because this woman isn't capable of accepting accountability. She also can't just let me win in the VA Supreme Court either, because it means she faces serious legal consequences when the felony is vacated. But her fighting to prevent me from getting my life back will make everyone hate her, especially considering what the Charlottesville law enforcement did to me and my family in Dickerman's name. Those optics will be terrible. Any attempt to prevent me from righting the wrongs she committed against me will backfire massively. It'll definitely make a jury absolutely hate her. Once Dickerman goes down that road she can never take it back or excuse it away. She'll get dragged for that decision.

Michelle Dickerman will take a hit no matter what option she takes in the end - but some options would limit the fallout to others around her and maybe even limit the damages she is facing. Dickerman is not smart enough to choose those options however. She'll choose the ones that end up doing the most to fuck over her and everyone else around her. Because that's just what Dickerman has always done. It's the only consistency the woman has.

We've been stuck in a cycle for a very, very, very long time. And the only way to break that cycle has always been for Michelle Dickerman to accept responsibility and answer for the harm she causes other people via her thoughtless actions. But the idea of taking personal responsibility is anathema to Michelle Dickerman. So she lashes out and causes more harm instead, and then plays victim when someone decides to not let her get away with it. Thus the cycle repeats, and everything is just made worse for everyone - for herself especially. That's the kind of malignancy we're dealing with here.

We'll just have to let a court decide how much Dickerman answers for, because she isn't capable of making that call herself. Not even if it saves the people around her from a hell of a lot of grief.

Anyway, I'll continue to work on the new post coming up where I address the new legal developments. Until that pops up, you can check the update on the michellemanweiler.com website, and the update post below this one, for a bit of background on what those new legal developments are.