Law Enforcement Corruption and Cover-ups

This isn't the second of the short posts going over the previous info I mentioned, I haven't had the opportunity yet to start on that but I will once this post is published. Instead I wanted to go over a video that I felt was rather important to discuss.

I came across an interesting video from a channel that I've been a long time follower of called "The Civil Rights Lawyer" created by West Virginia civil rights attorney John H. Bryan. It relates to a massive scandal on the part of the West Virginia State Police. I'll let the video go into the specifics of this very serious issue. It also appears that the WV State Police is involved in an additional problem with their SWAT team and another cover-up, in which Mr. Bryan is representing the victim in that case.

The details on the SWAT team issue is not discussed in the video I've posted here, instead another video explaining the SWAT incident is on Mr. Bryan's channel. It is the second video previous to this one listed here, can’t miss it. Since I haven't posted that video here I'll summarize it.

Mr. Bryan's client was shot within his home by the WV State Police SWAT team while he had been sleeping, though the State Police claimed that the client had attacked them with a hammer despite the fact he was not guilty of any crime and had no reason to attack them. The fact that the blood from Mr. Bryan's client is on the couch the client was sleeping on shows that the man was obviously shot by police while he was asleep - which goes against the SWAT team's claim. The SWAT team appears to be making up a story to cover-up for their own incompetence. This is not an unusual occurrence by far. Police departments have been caught making up charges against someone just to prevent them from filing a lawsuit on the department. Prosecutors in this country are all too willing to go along with this abuse of power and push forward with whatever charges they think will stick. Police and prosecutors all feed from the same trough after all.

The reason I decided to post this specific video is to show the levels that law enforcement is willing to go to in order to avoid trouble for their incompetence and bad behavior. Multiple examples of cover-ups have been shown within the West Virginia State Police.

In the case brought against me in 2006, Michelle Dickerman (known as Michelle Manweiler during the 2006 case) fabricated and tampered with printed emails she handed to the Charlottesville Police department. I've already gone over the evidence proving this tampering, and it was so blatant that even my incompetent former attorney spotted it right away.

No attempt was made by the Charlottesville Police to ever verify a single email Michelle Dickerman printed up, especially since they claimed that they somehow managed to "severely damage" my computer hard drive - which they said would prevent them from recovering anything from my computer until roughly nine months of repair work was conducted first. Which just so happens to be long enough to conduct a trial and convict me on false charges had I not been railroaded into a guilty plea by both the prosecution and my own attorney. Rather easy to convict when I have no ability to obtain exculpatory evidence due to the fairy tale damage to a perfectly working hard drive.

This lie by police (I do not believe for one second that they ever actually damaged the hard drive) conveniently prevented them from having to obtain the original emails that had actually been sent to Michelle Dickerman, prevented my recovery of exculpatory evidence, and allowed the District Attorney's office to railroad me with the aid of my former attorney into pleading to a felony charge they knew me to be innocent of.

I am accursing the Charlottesville Police and District Attorney's office of having become aware of Michelle Dickerman's fabrication of evidence after they had arrested me. I am accusing them of lying about the destruction of critical evidence, which was done to prevent anyone from finding out that they had been tricked by a rich UVA law school student with a rich UVA alumni father who was the CFO of a bank at the time. I have evidence backing up all my accusations, I just need to actually have someone listen. I fully believe Michelle Dickerman would receive multiple felonies from the evidence in my possession - and she wouldn't be the only one facing a criminal investigation when my case is reported on by the news media.

With the police department's lie of seriously damaging my computer hard drive, and with Michelle Dickerman taking down her Myspace account right after hearing of my arrest which destroyed the original emails on her end (proven on this blog with evidence and admissions by my former attorney, and a lawyer like Dickerman would have known better than to delete evidence), there was no ability to recover evidence of Michelle Dickerman's crimes nor recover evidence proving the situation was not what she claimed.

The only other way the Charlottesville Law Enforcement could have recovered the original emails thanks to the loss of both sources of evidence was by getting Myspace to send the original emails - and Charlottesville law enforcement had no interest in doing this. They could have waited to "repair" the claimed damage to the hard drive which would have been the responsible thing to do knowing that none of the email printouts from Dickerman were ever verified - but of course they wouldn't, given that they lied about damaging the hard drive in the first place.

The entire purpose of the cover-up and my subsequent railroading was to hide their screw up. They got tricked by a lawyer fresh out of law school and would be facing civil if not criminal penalties for their incompetence. Which they wouldn't have ended up in that situation if law enforcement hadn't been motivated by a desire to pull attention away from other scandals happening at the time.

Charlottesville law enforcement rushed to club me over the head and hyped up my case to distract the public from scandals the local court system was facing. Around the time of my arrest a rich UVA student named Andrew Alston was being released early from prison after receiving a slap on the wrist for stabbing a man to death. I noticed less media attention was directed at Alston's early release after I was hauled down to Charlottesville. Another case I was told about was a man being allowed to assault multiple women because the Charlottesville court system kept letting him out on bond. Even the Charlottesville probation officer performing the Pre-Sentencing Investigation said my case came at a really bad time.

The Charlottesville law enforcement didn't do their due diligence because they saw my case as an opportunity to jingle something shiny in front of the public and news media. When they discovered after my arrest that Michelle Dickerman had not only tampered with the evidence but fabricated what the entire case was built upon, the lie about damaging my computer hard drive was put forward to hide Dickerman's crime.

I was then railroaded into a felony plea agreement under threats from both the prosecution and my former attorney - all to protect a rich UVA student's future and more importantly the integrity of the C'ville court system from yet another scandal. Can you imagine the fallout from law enforcement causing the city to be sued after being tricked by a rich UVA student, right around the time that another rich UVA student was being released early from prison after getting a slap on the wrist for stabbing a man to death? Throwing my life under the bus was just another Tuesday for the Charlottesville law enforcement - and an intentional act of maliciousness by Michelle Dickerman and her parents. 

As you can see from the video above, law enforcement cover-ups and scandals are nothing new. They are not even uncommon. Mr. Bryan points out that what we're seeing is merely the tip of the iceberg for what has actually been going on within the West Virginia State Police. Whenever I discuss the cover-up by the Charlottesville police and District attorney's office in my posts, keep in mind the video and the fact that this kind of thing happens all the time. You just don't hear about most of it. It's really easy for law enforcement to hide their fuck-ups when they hold all the cards.

The cover-up in my situation didn't involve some massive conspiracy with lots of individuals involved. While I believe the Manweiler family pulled strings with politicians and UVA administration to ensure that harm was done for the benefit of their daughter, it's likely that most (if not all) of the individuals putting pressure on law enforcement had no idea that there was a cover-up going on. The only people who knew what was actually taking place was the Manweilers, Charlottesville prosecutors Joe Platania and Warner Chapman, Detective Nicolas Rudman and his supervisor, and potentially then police chief Timothy Longo. It's highly likely that my former attorney William Johnson at the very least suspected what was happening.

It's quite probable that Johnson had been brought in on the whole thing, and was working hand-in-hand with the prosecution against his client. Though just as easily he could have only noticed what was going on and just didn't have an interest in stopping it - because then he would actually have to earn the money he demanded upfront. He certainly stopped being my lawyer once he met Michelle Dickerman. That's when he admitted to having a locker room style talk with prosecutor Joseph Platania over the phone when they were both discussing Michelle Dickerman.

William Johnson stated that he and Platania were "discussing Ms. Manweiler's achievements and her 'assets'" and he looks at me with a shit eating grin as he emphasizes the word 'assets'. Doesn't take a genius to figure out what that means, especially when Johnson was a blatant womanizer. When my mother was at a court hearing with my sisters, William Johnson was ogling both my sisters while he was talking to my mother about the case and wasn't ashamed about doing it. While Johnson discussed the subject of Michelle Dickerman over the phone, prosecutor Joseph Platania in turn got so excited during this sexual discussion that he offered to set up a meeting between Johnson and Michelle Dickerman so that the two of them could talk.

Understand what that means: a prosecutor became very excited during an inappropriate sexual talk with defense counsel about a claimed victim that said prosecutor was representing, and that prosecutor attempted to setup a meeting between the claimed victim and the defense attorney. The prosecutor offered to setup this meeting solely because Johnson was engaging in sexual talk about that claimed victim with the prosecutor. Johnson refused this meeting but his motivation wasn't anything noble - he stated that he was too lazy to make the trip to Charlottesville from Matthews County just for that. When relaying this story to me, Johnson was actually mocking Platania as he imitated the prosecutor's inquiry to him on whether Johnson wanted to have the meeting setup with Dickerman. Despite Johnson's clear and expressed interests towards Michelle Dickerman - even he expressed concern over Platania's outburst and meeting offer.

Johnson's willingness to go along with the prosecution's railroading, whether just suspecting the cover-up or going full co-conspirator mode, was motivated due to his own laziness and his continuously expressed (multiple instances, some even recorded) sexual attraction to Michelle Dickerman. As for why he wasn't fired - we tried that and the prosecutor threatened me over it and demanded I keep my attorney or else.

So the cover-up by the Charlottesville law enforcement only involved a handful of people. And it's really easy to commit a cover-up when only a handful actually know about it - especially when all parties involved have something to lose if anyone found out about the issue being covered up.

Nothing about the 2006 cover-up, and my ensuing railroading into charges I was innocent of, is new or unique in the United States. My case is not even new or unique in Charlottesville. I'm not the first person the Charlottesville law enforcement did this to nor was I the last. It happens all the time. The difference is that I have proof of all of it - something that most people don't have since law enforcement is usually able to hide away any proof since they hold all the cards. My problem has never been an issue of having evidence. I can prove everything that happened and I can back up my accusations. My problem is getting someone to listen. All the evidence in the world doesn't mean shit if you can't get it out front of a courtroom or in the public eye. I've grown tired of having the injustice done to me ignored for nearly twenty years. There are many ways to force people to listen, some of which are less desirable than others. We'll see whether I have to make certain choices or not, but I think I've already made my decision on the option I'm going to take.

Something I want to additionally mention further relates to the other video by Mr. Bryan that I alluded to earlier. When it comes to the claims by the West Virginia State Police SWAT and Mr. Bryan's client, it's essentially his word against the cops - because none of the SWAT team members were apparently wearing bodycams. How convenient for the cops. As Mr. Bryan discusses in the other video, our society has for some reason decided that the word of a police officer is unquestionable in court. As more and more cases of corruption come to light it becomes more apparent that this needs to stop.

A dishonest person doesn't magically become honest when you hand them a badge. Quite the opposite. I ran into this very issue in 2006. I had been interviewed by Detective Rudman and unfortunately I made the mistake of talking to the cops. There were a lot of things that happened during it that I've previously discussed, but one issue is that I never confessed to the charges against me. I told Detective Rudman flat out that I never threatened any form of violence against Michelle Dickerman, thus denying that I had committed the felony charge filed against me.

I had also been informed during the interview, and afterwards, that the stalking misdemeanor filed against me was due to Michelle Dickerman claiming I went to her residence in Charlottesville. Multiple sources stated that Michelle Dickerman made the accusation of Charlottesville visits at the start of the case - which I've demonstrated some of that evidence in my possession on this previously. I've also further proven on this blog that Charlottesville visitations never happened - using Michelle Dickerman's own admission in her Victim Impact Statement (VIS) which proves it never happened. At no point was I ever in the city of Charlottesville until I was hauled from Hampton to Charlottesville at night by Detective Rudman.

Michelle Dickerman said that she was worried that I'd eventually figure out where she lived and worked in her VIS. Well if she was worried that I'd eventually figure out her address, that means she was aware that I had never found out that information before being arrested. So why did Dickerman make those false statements (which I can prove she made) at the start of the case? Both Dickerman and I know exactly why she did of course - it's the same reason the little narcist has spread many lies for years. So obviously I never committed the stalking charge since I never went to Charlottesville, and I told this to Detective Rudman. Doesn't sound like I confessed to all the charges does it?

My refusal to confess to charges I knew I never committed was a bit of a problem for the Charlottesville law enforcement. But they had an answer for that problem. They conveniently "misplaced" the tape of my interview with Detective Rudman. A tape recorded interview that they claimed was so much in their favor just happened to disappear from inventory after the prosecution reviewed the recording. Again how convenient for them. This allowed Detective Rudman and Prosecutor Joseph Platania to make whatever claims they wanted about the "misplaced" interview tapes. Joseph Platania proclaimed throughout the case that I had "confessed to all charges". Detective Rudman intended to testify in court that I had "confessed to all charges". Something they both knew never happened.

Since the Charlottesville law enforcement just so happened to "misplace" the interview tape recording, it came down to my word versus the word of a police officer on what was actually said during an interview that they claimed was so much in their favor. On top of them also claiming to have somehow "damaged" my computer hard drive after Michelle Dickerman deleted the original evidence on her Myspace account - which made her blatantly tampered printouts the sole evidence as the basis of the felony charge.

All of this "loss" of evidence was recorded in my former lawyer's notes and fully admitted to by him on the tape recordings my mother conducted during her meetings with him. I can prove the event of the "misplaced" taped interview just as I can prove the claimed "damaged" hard drive event. I don't believe that the police actually "lost" or "damaged" either of those things, but I can absolutely prove in a court of law that they were claiming that they had lost all this critical evidence.

With it coming down to my word against Detective Rudman's word on what was actually said during the interview (thanks to them just happening to "misplace" the interview tape), you know exactly which person's word would be trusted in court. Because like Mr. Bryan says in his other video, we as a society have decided that having a badge magically makes you an honest person who's word is beyond reproach. I learned the hard way that this belief is absolutely a delusion.

Needless to say - don't ever talk to the cops. No seriously - shut the fuck up when questioned by a cop. Cops are not your friend. Cops are not trying to understand your side of the story. They want to incriminate you so they can file away the paperwork and clock out for the day. Even if you don't incriminate yourself they will find a way to change that if they really want. Just like they did with me. If I had a lawyer present that day the Charlottesville law enforcement wouldn't have been able to pull that stunt. Because another official of the court would be present to have heard what actually went on. But because it was just me and two cops in the room, it all comes down to the court believing the word of a cop or the word of a guy accused of a felony. I'll give you three guesses which one the court would believe without question.

Anyway, I thought the video would be useful in showing any doubters that law enforcement is not the immaculate defenders of truth and justice. Anyone who rolls their eyes at the idea of cops committing a cover-up is either extremely delusional or just fucking stupid. The evidence exists all over and you have to be deliberately refusing to look if you think it can't happen. It happens all the time. What is detailed in the video I linked in at the top of this post is nothing new and it's just the tip of the iceberg. The same can be said about my own case in 2006. I was not the first person Charlottesville has done this to and I wasn't the last either.

Two Felonies for Dickerman

Michelle Dickerman and her
father Gregory Manweiler

I found something interesting that I wanted to pass on, specifically involving potential criminal charges for Michelle Dickerman.

This will be the first of two short posts. The second post will be a reposting of my former attorney's plea deal proposal letter along with two emails from the prosecution. One of the emails from Joseph Platania (the assistant prosecutor handling the case) threatens me out of a civil right to a fair trial, but he also admits that the railroading occurring to me in order to secure a false felony charge is exactly what Michelle Dickerman wanted as well.

The other email has the prosecutor fully stating that Michelle Dickerman and her parents were consulted about artificially extending my confinement into November. The reason I say artificially is that the prosecution deliberately delayed my sentencing hearing with the expressed purpose of keeping me confined in jail as long as possible (on a felony he knew Michelle Dickerman fabricated evidence for) until November. Thus without a judge's input and outside of any legal mechanisms, the prosecutor was using underhanded means to inflict further injury to me and unnecessarily extend my confinement. Even my former attorney questioned him on the need to extend my confinement.

I was told by my former attorney that this was being done solely as retaliation. Retaliation from the prosecution for having tried to hire another attorney to replace my incompetent one, and retaliation from the Manweiler family for angering them. Thus the Manweiler family was receiving further special treatment and being allowed to inflict harm upon me through underhanded means out of pure spite. Given that Michelle Dickerman was working in DC prior to this and had in turn already moved out of Charlottesville long before November - there was no actual purpose behind extending my confinement into November other than outright maliciousness (which again, my attorney told me it was expressly done as retaliation).

Any reasonable person would agree that this act served no purpose other than to inflict harm, thus malice and intent to cause injury by the act can be proven. My boss at the time at Northop Grumman had attempted to hold my position vacant as long as possible, but by November he had been forced to hire someone else. Thus this act of malice inflicted harm financially and to my career going forward. The years of unemployment that resulted from this even caused me harm very recently, when I had to apply for other jobs after my recent employer went bankrupt. The gap in employment was a red flag to other employers I interviewed with.

The prosecutor further admits that this plan to delay the sentencing and extend my confinement to November was told to Michelle Dickerman and her parents (Greg and Carole Manweiler). He goes on to further state that Michelle Dickerman and her parents were in full agreement with the prosecution pulling this unethical, malicious, and unnecessarily harmful act

Both the letter and the emails on the second post will serve to drive home four specific points:

1. That Michelle Dickerman (and her parents) had a far more reasonable plea deal presented to them than what they ultimately went along with, and thus Michelle Dickerman and her parents were acting with malicious intent to inflict as much harm as possible. Every legal professional I've shown my former attorney's letter to has praised the idea and said there was zero justification on anyone's part to reject the plea deal he proposed. All agree that my railroading into a felony charge instead was done out of pure spite by all parties given that a considerably more reasonable plea deal offer had been put forward to them. Since I can prove beyond all doubt that Michelle Dickerman fabricated evidence and lied to law enforcement, she was aware I was not guilty of the felony I was being threatened into, and yet she wanted to inflict as much harm as she possibly could despite having far more acceptable terms that wouldn't cause as much injury to my future.
   
   
2. That Michelle Dickerman willingly went along with railroading me into the felony charge in full knowledge and agreement with the prosecution's actions. The prosecution fully admitted, in both emails and in court, that Michelle Dickerman was a knowing and willing participant in what was being done. Proving an act of malice on Michelle Dickerman's part given that she had more lenient options available and yet she wished to cause maximum harm against a man she knew she had fabricated evidence against.
   
   
3. That Michelle Dickerman's parents (Greg and Carole Manweiler) were consulted throughout the proceedings and had just as much of a decision in the harm to be inflicted upon me as their daughter did - admitted to by both the prosecution and my former attorney.
   
   
4.  That both Michelle Dickerman and her parents acted with malice and a deliberate manipulation of the legal system to inflict further harm upon me, specifically as mentioned in one of the emails with their request to wrongfully extend my confinement into November - when their daughter had already moved out of Charlottesville long before.

While I prep that second post, I want to share something I found in an article I read today at lunch. This article mentioned two felony charges being pressed against a former police officer. This officer had been involved in two shootings with two different individuals - the first one being a paralyzed man in a wheel chair. The officer did not have charges brought in either shooting (not surprising given how hard it is to overcome the corrupt implementation of qualified immunity), but it did cost the city a great deal of money from lawsuits in both cases.

It was found after the second investigation that the officer had actually made false statements and tampered with evidence. Here is a screenshot of the paragraph related to the charges.

This specifically related to the officer having swapped the barrel of his gun after the first shooting, and then lying to investigators about the barrel swap when being questioned on the second shooting. Thus he was charged with two felonies - one for the false statement and one for swapping the barrel which was believed to be an intent to interfere with the investigation.

As for the mention of lack of candor, in regards to legal matters is typically defined as knowingly leaving out important information and details that should have been disclosed during statements, and that withholding said information causes statements to be inaccurate. A "staggering and disturbing lack of candor" can absolutely describe Michelle Dickerman's behavior during the events of 2006 and her behavior in general. Not to mention just flat out lying about events that happened. This isn't me just saying this either. Just look for the recent post I did called 'A Catalog of Lies', where I prove that Michelle Dickerman has been lying about what went on during our entire butting of heads - using her own statements to prove she isn't being honest at all about what has happened. 

Now granted these charges were brought forward in Delaware and not in Virginia. Obviously not everything is going to line up the same between two different states - but I know that Virginia has charges related to tampering with evidence and making false statements to law enforcement. Virginia also has a disorderly conduct charge, much like the charge brought against Jussie Smollett. It's a 'catchall' type of charge from what I understand - and Smollett got a felony for it by lying to law enforcement about a hate crime.

Delaware was willing to charge a cop with no prior criminal record with felonies for lying to law enforcement and tampering with evidence. Two charges I can prove in court that Michelle Dickerman committed. I have no doubt that Virginia can charge both crimes as a felony, and in our current political climate I doubt they would be willing to risk the fallout of letting a white girl who got special treatment off the hook for inflicting so much harm. And it is my understanding that there are no statute of limitations in Virginia for felony charges. So even today Michelle Annette Dickerman could, and should, be charged with felonies for her actions in Charlottesville in 2006.

One of the few good things about this case is that I have plenty of documentation to back up the events and actions of other parties. My former attorney was an idiot but he was also in love with the sound of his own voice, so he thankfully admits to everything on the tape recordings that were made. From conveniently "misplaced" and "damaged" evidence by police (such as my computer hard drive), to admitting to discrepancies on the emails that prove blatant tampering by Michelle Dickerman - he happily admits to all of it.

He also ended up handing over all his personal notes and the emails with prosecutors, likely because in his arrogance he assumed it couldn't possibly come back to bite him in the ass one day. It was documented by the prosecution and my lawyer that Michelle Dickerman's parents were fully consulted and pushed for the actions of the prosecution on their daughter's behalf. This makes Dickerman's parents just as liable for the harm done to me as any of the other guilty parties. You don't get to push the prosecution to inflict more harm than warranted out of malice, and then pretend you don't bear any responsibility for the damage you inflicted when it turns out your daughter actually lied about what happened.

Given that Michelle Dickerman was 25 years old at the time her parents had no business being consulted or having any part of the decision making process. Dickerman was an adult and her parents did not require any input. My family certainly wasn't consulted or allowed to be part of the process. As I said before, my former attorney admits in writing and on tape that Dickerman's parents had just as much of a role in the harm done against me as their daughter. The prosecution admits to this as well - in emails and in court.

I feel that the only way justice would be fully served if and when any criminal charges are brought against Michelle Dickerman, is if her parents are considered accessories to the criminal acts. I firmly believe that Michelle Dickerman had confessed to her parents about the evidence tampering during this time period. Given the Charlottesville law enforcement was aware of the issue and was railroading me to cover up for their negligence - I can't see Michelle Dickerman keeping her actions a secret from her parents.

I believe Gregory and Carole Manweiler had full knowledge that their daughter had lied and falsified evidence this entire time. I believe Greg Manweiler used his connections and financial means to ensure that I was thrown under the bus so that his daughter would be protected from responsibility - and the prosecution and police were all too willing given that it was their necks on the line as well.

I believe the possibility exists that my former attorney, William Johnson, could have been offered financial compensation by Gregory Manweiler to throw the case. It became blatantly clear that Johnson had ceased being my attorney during the case and was working in cooperation with the prosecution. Either it was hand-in-hand or at least making no attempt to challenge any of it. Whether he did this out of his own laziness and corruption, or whether he received "encouragement" to behave like this - that is something that would need to be investigated.

I absolutely believe William Johnson would take a bribe to screw his client so long as he could avoid anyone finding out about it. The guy made it very clear that he was a complete piece of shit during my case. I absolutely don't put any immoral acts past Johnson and I think he would happily do whatever he believed he could get away with. One beneficial thing with Johnson in this case is that he's also sleazy enough to sell out others to help himself. If Johnson believes he could save his own skin by ratting out anyone else, I have absolutely no doubt that he would do it without a second thought. He's also lazy and arrogant enough to have not covered his tracks very well, meaning that he's the weak link in anything inappropriate that might have taken place in 2006.

I also absolutely believe Gregory Manweiler would be happy to grease a lawyer's palms to get back at a guy who pissed off his daughter. The Manweiler family has always oozed arrogance from every pore, and people who behave like that tend to think the rules apply to everyone but them. "All animals are equal but some animals are more equal than others" as the quote from Animal Farm goes. While I honestly believe Michelle Dickerman has a personality disorder known to psychiatrists as Vulnerable Narcissism (also called Covert Narcissism online), there is also plenty of her behavior that I believe to be learned from her parents. When on more than one occasion I've witnessed her and her parents walk with their noses literally pointed in the air as they wear a look of disdain on their faces for everyone around them, you can't help but notice that the apple didn't fall far from the tree and not in a good way. I used to think depictions of snobbish people having their nose in the air was just a caricature to mock arrogant individuals - until I encountered the Manweiler family. Some people really do that nonsense.

Johnson's bank account isn't the only one I believe could have benefited during the 2006 criminal case. When this case goes public Gregory Manweiler should absolutely be investigated for the possibility of bribery and manipulation of the legal process. I wouldn't be the only person calling for this. Every person who hears about the 2006 case makes similar statements - that it sounds like her father got someone important at the University of Virginia to put pressure on the Charlottesville law enforcement. The entire criminal case of 2006 sounds like outright corruption and special treatment from the very start when everything is laid out. Nobody would find it hard to believe that money changed hands during or after the events that took place. I can't imagine that trying to subvert legal proceedings unethically wouldn't be a criminal charge, and that this would apply regardless of whether it was via bribes or by getting important people to pressure the courts and law enforcement. I would think it would fall under obstruction of justice.

Now I'm not a lawyer, and just because I believe that Greg and Carole Manweiler should be charged as accessories to their daughter's crimes doesn't mean it is remotely possible to be charged as such. In fact unfortunately it probably doesn't work like that. Even if Gregory and Carole Manweiler couldn't be charged as accessories to their daughter's crimes, the fact that the prosecution and my former attorney fully admit that they were being consulted about the harm being done to me, were themselves pushing for the prosecution to inflict said harm, and were in full agreement with the damages done to me - they are more than able to be held liable in civil court even if their guilt does not extend to criminal court.

The Manweilers acted with clear malice - and according to the prosecution and my lawyer they were aware of, and onboard with, everything being done to me. They are liable for the mental trauma, physical trauma, financial and career damages, the civil rights violations done for their benefit, and nearly 20 years of life with a false felony charge. All of this was done with the full knowledge and consent of Michelle Dickerman and her parents Gregory and Carole Manweiler.

As I said at the start of this, I will be publishing that proof on the next small post.